AIRLIVEAIRLIVE
  • News
  • Emergency
  • Accident
  • Incident
  • Tracking
  • Blog
  • Report
  • Military
  • Space
  • CamsLIVE
  • Store
    • T-shirts
    • Hat
    • Models
    • Toys
    • Boeing
    • Airbus
    • Space
    • My Account
    • Order tracking
0

No products in the cart.

Notification Show More
AIRLIVEAIRLIVE
0
Search
  • News
  • Emergency
  • Accident
  • Incident
  • Tracking
  • Blog
  • Report
  • Military
  • Space
  • CamsLIVE
  • Store
    • T-shirts
    • Hat
    • Models
    • Toys
    • Boeing
    • Airbus
    • Space
    • My Account
    • Order tracking
Follow US
AIRLIVE Aviation news network
Get aviation breaking news on WhatsApp
AIRLIVE > All articles > History > #OnThisDay in 1985, Japan Airlines Flight 123 crashes into Mount Takamagahara, Japan
History

#OnThisDay in 1985, Japan Airlines Flight 123 crashes into Mount Takamagahara, Japan

AirCrashMayday
Last updated: August 12, 2016, 20:08 UTC
Published: Friday, August 12, 2016, at 12:00 UTC
Category: History
Author: AirCrashMayday
SHARE

31 years ago today, Japan Airlines Flight 123 (JA8119) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Tokyo’s Haneda Airport to Osaka International Airport, Japan. The Boeing 747-SR-146 was carrying 509 passengers and 15 crew members. 

JA8119_at_Itami_Airport_1984

JA8119 at Osaka International Airport, Japan in 1984. 


ACCIDENT

At the time of the accident the aircraft was on the fifth of its six planned flights of the day. There were fifteen crew members including three cockpit crew and 12 flight attendants.

rsz_nikkojumbo123crew

The Captain was Masami Takahama, 49 from Akita, Japan. He was a veteran pilot, having logged approximately 12,400 total flight hours – roughly 4,850 of which were accumulated flying 747’s. Takahama served as a training instructor on the flight supervising the First Officer while handing radio communications.

rsz_1nikkojumbo123crewThe First Officer was Yutaka Sasaki, 39 from Kobe, Japan. He had approximately 4,000 total flight hours to his credit and logged roughly 2,650 hours in the 747. Flight 123 was a training flight flown by Sasaki in order for him to be promoted to Captain.

rsz_2nikkojumbo123crewThe Flight Engineer was Hiroshi Fukuda, 46 from Kyoto, Japan. He was a veteran flight engineer and had approximately 9,800 total flight hours, of which roughly 3,850 were accrued flying 747s.

0631425-v20-16

The aircraft landed at Haneda from New Chitose Airport at 4:50PM as Japan Airlines Flight 514.

After more than an hour at the ramp Flight 123 pushed back from gate 18 at 6:04pm. At 6:12pm Japan Airlines Flight 123 took off from Runway 15L at Haneda Airport, Tokyo, Japan. 12 minutes behind schedule.

Rear_pressure_bulkhead_B747.svg

About 12 minutes after takeoff, at near cruising altitude over Sagami Bay, the aircraft’s aft pressure bulkhead burst open. This caused an explosive decompression, causing pressurized air to rush out the cabin, bringing down ceiling around the rear lavatories. The compressed air then burst the unpressurized fuselage aft of the bulkhead unseating the vertical stabilizer and severing all four hydraulic lines.

ChDx17PW4AA52zz

A photograph taken from the ground confirmed that the vertical stablilizer was missing. Loss of cabin pressure at high altitude caused a lack of oxygen throughout; emergency oxygen masks for passengers were deployed. Flight attendants, including one off-duty administered oxygen to various passengers using hand-held tanks.

ChDxz68WUAAVYio

The pilots set their transponders to broadcast a distress signal. Tokyo Area Control Center directed the aircraft to descend and follow emergency landing vectors. Because of control problems Captain Takahama requested a vector to Haneda opposing ATC’s suggestion to divert to Nagoya Airfield, knowing Haneda was ideally suited for a 747 in case of an emergency.

Hydraulic fluid completely drained away through the rupture. With total lost of hydraulic control and non-functional control surfaces, plus the lack of stabilizing influence from the vertical stabilizer, the aircraft began up and down oscillation in phugoid cycle. In response the pilots exerted efforts to establish stability using differential engine thrust. Further measures to exert control, such as lowering the landing gear and flaps, interfered with control by throttle; the aircrew ability to control the aircraft deteriorated.

Japan_Airlines_123_route_English

Upon descending at 13,500ft the pilots reported an uncontrollable aircraft. Heading over the Izu Peninsula the pilots turned towards the Pacific Ocean then back towards the shore; they descended below 7,000ft before returning to climb. The aircraft reached 13,000ft before entering an uncontrollable descent into the mountains and disappearing from radar at 6:56pm at 6,800ft.

140331112933-jal-flight-123-airline-safety-horizontal-large-gallery

In the final moments, the wing clipped a mountain ridge. During a subsequent rapid plunge, the plane then slammed into a second ridge, then flipped and landed on its back. The aircraft’s crash point, at an elevation of 5,135ft.

The elapsed time from the bulkhead explosion to when the plane hit the mountain was estimated at 32 minutes – long enough for some passengers to write farewell messages to their families. None of the four flight crews in the simulator was able to keep the plane aloft for as long as the 32 minutes achieved by the actual crew.

Due to the delay in the rescue operation a few of the occupants had survived the crash only to die from shock and exposure overnight in the mountains or from injuries that if tended to earlier would not have been fatal. In total 520 passengers & crew were killed. Only 4 survived.


INVESTIGATION

The investigation was led by the Japan Aircraft Investigation Commission. They concluded that:

747-tailstrike

The aircraft was involved in a tailstrike incident at Osaka International Airport seven years earlier as JAL Flight 115 which damaged the aircraft’s rear pressure bulkhead. The subsequent repair of the bulkhead did not conform to Boeing’s approved repair methods.

1024px-Bulkhead_Repair (1)

The Boeing technicians fixing the aircraft used two separate splice plates, one with two rows of rivets and one with only one row when the procedure called for one continuous splice plate (essentially a patch or doubler plate) with three rows of rivets to reinforce the damaged bulkhead. The incorrect repair reduced the part’s resistance to metal fatigue to about 70% compared to the correctly executed repair. According to the FAA, one splice plate which was specified for the job was cut into two pieces parallel to the stress crack it was intended to reinforce, “to make it fit”. This negated the effectiveness of one of the rows of rivets. During the investigation, Boeing calculated that this incorrect installation would fail after approximately 10,000 pressurisation; the aircraft accomplished 12,318 successful flights from the time that the faulty repair was made to when the crash happened.

When the bulkhead gave way, the resulting explosive decompression ruptured the lines of all four hydraulic systems and ejected the vertical stabilizer. With the aircraft’s flight controls disabled, the aircraft became uncontrollable.


Final Report

Article By: @AirCrashMayday

Sources: AviaitonSafety, Wikipedia


http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4o3xg1_air-disasters-out-of-control-s16e03_tv

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

LATEST NEWS

A ground worker was killed during French bee A350 pushback at Montreal-Trudeau Airport
Accident Canada
August 25, 2026
French bee Airbus A350-941
BF BF5761 F-HREY YUL
Unexplained U.S. C-17 Military Transport Aircraft Lands at Moscow’s Vnukovo Airport
Military Russia
August 25, 2026
Swiss LX9 from Chicago declared an emergency and diverted to airbase in middle of the Atlantic
Emergency Europe Tracking
August 25, 2026
Swiss International Air Lines Boeing 777-3DEER
HB-JNF LX LX9 TER
Emergency: United Boeing 767 to Newark dumped fuel before diversion to London Heathrow
Emergency Europe Tracking UK
August 24, 2026
United Airlines Boeing 767-424ER
LHR N76062 UA UA169
Italian woman seriously injured after being blown over by jet blast on Greek island
Europe News
August 23, 2026
JSI
TUI Boeing 737 MAX 8 to Manchester declared an emergency due to low fuel
Emergency Europe Tracking UK
August 23, 2026
TUI Airways Boeing 737 MAX 8
BY BY439 EMA G-TUMN MAN

Related news

EuropeHistoryUK

18 years ago, a British Airways Boeing 777 crash-landed 270 meters short of runway at Heathrow

January 17, 2026
History

The Worst Plane Crashes in Aviation History

September 30, 2023
History

10 years ago, a Boeing 747 stalled and crashed on takeoff from Bagram Air Base

April 29, 2023
History

On March 12, 2003 Singapore Airlines Boeing 747 suffered a tail strike as the rotation speed was 33 knots less than required

March 12, 2023
AIRLIVE.net is an Aviation news network supported by a team of journalists and aviation enthusiasts.
Add AIRLIVE as Google preferred source
Since 2014, AIRLIVE.net has been publishing accurate aviation news and live updates from our sources around the world. This has led to the creation of the largest aviation community on social media.
Eyewitness to an event?
Alert AIRLIVE's newsdesk on WhatsApp
AIRLIVEAIRLIVE
Follow US
Copyright AIRLIVE 2026
  • Contact
  • Submit a story
  • Privacy policy
  • Return policy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?